Syllabus Design

Understanding the Syllabus from a UDL Focus

Welcome to the Syllabus Design section of our Universal Design for Learning (UDL) resource for instructors. This section is dedicated to guiding you through the essentials of creating a syllabus that not only outlines your course structure but also integrates UDL principles to support diverse learners. 

In this section, you will explore the fundamental role of a syllabus in higher education and its importance in setting the tone for your course. We will look at how to integrate UDL principles into key components that make up a syllabus. In addition to the official syllabus, we will explore ways for you to present your syllabus in alternative formats, such as video and interactive online versions, to cater to different learning preferences. Finally, you will utilize a UDL checklist to review and refine your syllabus, ensuring it meets the principles of Universal Design for Learning. 

For a podcast-style audio overview of the entire Syllabus Design section, please listen below (captioning available and transcript downloadable under the player):

Nine Common Elements of Universal Design for Learning

According to EnACT (2012), there are Nine Common Elements of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) within higher education. These elements would be helpful when thinking about syllabus design that would be meaningful for all learners in your course: 

As outlined in the following graphic, instructors can engage in a process, and assuming that educators have a fundamental comprehension of the UDL principles, they are encouraged to choose a course they frequently teach and examine these principles in relation to the course’s “threshold” or fundamental concepts and the corresponding student learning outcomes.

The CAST UDL guidelines and EnACT Nine Common Elements serve as beneficial tools and research-backed strategies that aid educators in reflecting on “what they teach,” “how they teach,” and “how they evaluate” student learning in the context of the chosen key course concepts. Educators are then prompted to devise and execute UDL modifications related to these chosen key course concepts and evaluate the learning outcomes as a result.  

The image is a flowchart related to “Engaging in Reflective Teaching through UDL (Universal Design for Learning).” It highlights a cyclical process starting with “Select a Course,” followed by “Reflect on UDL,” “Implement Changes & Assess Outcomes,” and “Evaluate Outcomes.” These steps are interconnected, suggesting an ongoing process of improvement in teaching methods. The chart references various resources and frameworks such as CAST Guidelines, 9 Common Elements, UDL Syllabus Rubric, and QOLT for online/hybrid. This image is relevant for educators looking to integrate UDL principles into their teaching practices to enhance learning accessibility.
Figure 1 EnACT & UDL Universe (2023), “Engaging in Reflective Teaching through UDL,” https://enact.sonoma.edu/c.php?g=789377&p=5650624 

UDL-Focused Syllabus Design

A syllabus is a document that sets out what a student would be expected to engage in over the duration of a course. A syllabus is different from a course outline as it is considerably more detailed. A course outline more includes an overview of the topics/concepts, as scheduled out over the course, that will be covered. A course outline is more helpful to instructors as they begin designing their course and could be used as the starting point in designing a syllabus.  

More specifically, effective syllabi (plural of syllabus) serve a few different purposes: 

An invitation to students – outlining the course’s objectives and giving them a glimpse of what the course will entail. 

A form of agreement between the instructors and students – documenting the expectations for assignments and how grades will be allocated. 

A reference guide – offering logistical information such as the course schedule and office hours, as well as assessments and grading criteria. 

Designing syllabi from a student-centred approach can help to make the document more practical to students and increase the likelihood of students intentionally referring back to the syllabus. At the end of the day, the syllabus is really the first point of contact between the instructor and their students and can help to set the tone for the course as well as build rapport from the start (Shafer, 2021; Center for Teaching and Learning, 2023; The Derek Bok Center for Teaching and Learning, 2024).   

In general, it includes information about the course (dates and times, description), assessments (learning outcomes, types, evaluative methods, weightings), content (materials used, topics/concepts covered), and course and institutional policies, procedures, and regulations. Details pertaining to specific fields that are included in the syllabus can be found in the Simple Syllabus tab.

next Syllabus Design

Designing a Universal Design for Learning (UDL)-focused syllabus seeks to intentionally support students in their learning by facilitating inclusivity and a welcoming learning environment. This approach is rooted in the understanding that each student brings a unique set of skills, experiences, and perspectives to the classroom (Posey, n.d.). By incorporating UDL principles, we can create a syllabus that not only acknowledges these differences, but also leverages them as strengths (taking a positive, student-centred approach). 

When designing a syllabus from a UDL perspective, consider the following principles: 

  1. Multiple Means of Engagement: This principle involves outlining the learning goals and objectives, the relevance of the content, and any opportunities for choice within the course (UDL on Campus, n.d.). 
  2. Multiple Means of Representation: Be explicit about the ways in which students can access content (e.g., textbook, slides, course website, videos) where to find background information and multiple examples (UDL on Campus, n.d.) 
    • This principle is about providing a variety of options for how information will be presented for the course
  3. Multiple Means of Action & Expression: Use the syllabus to communicate regular routines to establish expectations, outline the timing and format of assessments, and offer resources for the management of information (UDL on Campus, n.d.). 
    • This principle is about providing a variety of ways for students to express what they have learned 

A UDL-focused syllabus goes beyond mere accessibility. It aims to create a learning environment where every student feels valued and empowered to participate fully. This involves presenting information in multiple formats, offering various ways for students to express their understanding, and fostering engagement through relevant and meaningful experiences (UDL on Campus, n.d.). 

As previously mentioned, a UDL-focused syllabus is more than a document; it’s a dynamic tool for promoting equity and excellence in higher education. It sets the tone for the course, communicates high expectations for all students, and provides a clear roadmap for success (UDL on Campus, n.d.). By designing with UDL in mind, we can ensure that our teaching is effective and inclusive, meeting the diverse needs of all learners. 

Though syllabi between different faculties and disciplines (and even within departments), the following policies would be helpful when designing content to be included in the syllabus:

These policies and procedures are important to include as it helps to facilitate a safe learning environment for all participants along with setting out expectations for both academic and non-academic behaviours during the course. 

The next section will specifically look at Simple Syllabus, our software for syllabus creation and management at KPU.

next Simple Syllabus Elements

 

Simple Syllabus

Simple Syllabus is a tool designed to make syllabus creation more consistent, accurate, and accessible for KPU students.

The Simple Syllabus platform integrates with some of KPU’s other information systems such as Curriculum Inventory Management (CIM) and scheduling systems (Banner) to auto populate required fields. Faculty enter their own course-specific content into a structured template that generates an accessible syllabus from the Simple Syllabus site within Moodle or in a PDF format which can be distributed to students. Once a Simple Syllabus template is completed, it is published and made available to students.

The Teaching & Learning Commons has developed a Sharepoint Site to further support instructors and Simple Syllabus use. The site includes a welcome video providing insight into benefits of use, a walkthrough video of the Simple Syllabus tool, and other fresh desk resources. Click the button below to access the site:

Example Simple Syllabus Template with UDL Guidance

See below a downloadable document with suggestions for you to consider UDL language you might include into selected editable fields.

In addition to the example syllabus template, the provided headers in this section represent the editable sections of the Simple Syllabus template for you to consider what you might include in your Simple Syllabus!

Territorial Acknowledgement
Course Information
UDL Considerations in Course and Instructor -level policies

In terms of course-level policies, UDL provides guidance to address barriers to learning by assuming variability among learners as “the rule.” As such, UDL promotes inclusive practices by multiplying the ways in which students access materials, engage with learning, and express skills and knowledge (UDL on Campus, n.d.; La, Dyjur, & Bair, 2018; Teaching Excellence and Innovation, 2024). 

These policies are crucial as they set the tone for the course and can significantly impact the learning experience of students. Here are some key considerations:

  1. Required Materials: If certain equipment or materials are required for the course, consider their accessibility. Are there alternative options available that can achieve the same learning outcomes? Can these materials be obtained in different formats to cater to diverse learning needs? 
  2. Practicum Requirements: If a practicum is a part of the course, ensure that the expectations and requirements are flexible enough to accommodate diverse learners. Can the practicum be completed in different settings or formats? 
  3. Assessment Types: If a specific type of assessment is mandated, consider how it can be designed to allow for multiple means of representation, action, and expression. For example, if a written exam is required, could it be offered in different formats (e.g., oral, presentation, project-based) to cater to diverse learners? 
  4. Grading Policies: While this might be more of an institutional policy, it’s worth mentioning. A UDL approach to grading would involve flexibility and multiple opportunities for students to demonstrate their understanding 
  5. Course Sequencing: If the course is part of a sequence, consider the progression of learners. Are there multiple pathways through the sequence that could cater to the diverse needs and pace of learners? 
Instructor Information

In terms of instructor-level policies, UDL encourages educators to embrace diversity in the classroom by recognizing that each student brings a unique set of skills, experiences, and learning styles. As such, UDL fosters an inclusive teaching approach by providing multiple ways for students to engage with the course material, participate in learning activities, and demonstrate their knowledge (UDL on Campus, n.d.; La, Dyjur, & Bair, 2018; Teaching Excellence and Innovation, 2024). 

These policies are pivotal as they reflect the instructor’s teaching philosophy and approach, and can profoundly influence the students’ learning journey. Here are some key considerations: 

  1. Flexibility in Attendance and Participation: Traditional policies may penalize students for absences or lack of participation. However, from a UDL perspective, instructors should consider the diverse needs and circumstances of their students.  
    • For example, offering alternative ways to participate or make up for missed classes can be beneficial 
  2. Late Work Policies: Traditional late work policies may not account for the variability in students’ lives.  
    • A UDL approach might involve more flexible deadlines, or the option for students to request extensions based on their individual need 
  3. Technology Policies: In the digital age, technology use in the classroom is a significant policy area. UDL encourages the use of technology that supports diverse learners needs and considerations for the use of specific technologies in supporting that learning should be explicit. 
    • For example, will you allow the use of Generative AI in your course? To what degree? 
  4. Interaction Policies: These policies govern how students interact with each other and with the instructor, including mode of communication, and expected response time 
    • UDL suggests structuring interactions that respect diversity and promote inclusion; being aware and considerate of each other’s time and circumstances 
Explanation of Course Description 
UDL-focused Syllabus Design with Course Modality 

Another important consideration when designing your course syllabus is the modality in which your course is being offered. This aspect focuses less on the content provided in the syllabus and more on how it is presented for ease of use by the students. Depending on whether your course is synchronous or asynchronous, the way students interact with and rely on the syllabus can vary significantly. 

Synchronous Courses 

In synchronous courses, where classes occur in real-time, either in-person or online, the syllabus serves as a guide that can be supplemented with live explanations and discussions. Here are some key points to consider for synchronous courses: 

  • Live Review: You can review the syllabus with students during the first class session, providing an opportunity to clarify any questions and emphasize important aspects 
  • Interactive Elements: Integrate interactive elements such as hyperlinks to resources, embedded videos, and digital tools that can be demonstrated during live sessions 
  • Regular Updates: Use the syllabus as a dynamic document that can be updated and discussed throughout the course, ensuring students are always aware of any changes or important dates 
Asynchronous Courses 

In asynchronous courses, where students engage with the material at their own pace, the syllabus becomes a crucial reference tool that students will rely on more heavily. Consider the following for asynchronous courses: 

  • Comprehensive Information: Ensure the syllabus is detailed and comprehensive, covering all aspects of the course, including clear instructions for assignments, deadlines, and communication methods 
  • Accessible Format: Present the syllabus in an easily accessible format, such as a downloadable PDF or an interactive online document, so students can refer to it anytime 
  • Self-Guided Navigation: Design the syllabus to be self-explanatory, with clear headings, sections, and links to additional resources, enabling students to navigate it independently 
  • Consistent Communication: Include information on how and when students can reach you for support, as they won’t have the benefit of real-time interactions
Explanation of Learning Outcomes 
Additional Accessibility Information 
Additional Learning Experiences (Lab, Co-op, etc.) 
Course Schedule 
UDL Course Considerations  
  • Flexible Course Breakdown: When dividing topics/concepts amongst weeks in the semester, consider the complexity and interconnectedness of the topics (Poorvu Center for Teaching and Learning, 2021; Centre for Innovation in Teaching & Learning, n.d.). Some topics may require more time than others. Flexibility is key – be prepared to adjust the schedule based on students’ understanding and progress 
    • Prioritize Essential Concepts: Identify the essential concepts that are critical for understanding the course material. These should be introduced early in the semester and revisited regularly to reinforce learning (Many & Horrell, 2014; Eberly Center, 2024) 
    • Sequential Learning: Arrange topics in a logical sequence that builds on previous knowledge. This helps students make connections between different concepts and enhances their understanding (Conway, 2012; Hayes, 2024) 
      • Backward Design – supports sequential learning by starting with the end goals, allowing instructors to map out lessons that build on each other in complexity. Through this progressive approach, each lesson serves as a foundation for the next, ensuring a coherent development of knowledge and skills from simple to advanced concepts (Stapleton-Corcoran, 2023; MIT Teaching + Learning Lab, n.d.)  
    • Interdisciplinary Approach: If possible, show how the topics covered in your course relate to other disciplines. This can help students see the relevance of what they are learning and how it applies to a broader context (Hirsch, 2020; SERC, 2024) 
      • For example: if you know that your course is a prerequisite for another discipline, it might be helpful to indicate to students in the syllabus where this connection occurs with interdisciplinary topics/concepts 
    • Integrate Various Learning Activities: Different students have different ways of learning. Some may prefer lectures, while others may learn better through discussions or hands-on activities. Try to integrate a variety of learning activities to cater to different learning styles 
      • For example: ePortfolio, essays, presentations, group work, debate, etc. 
    • Regular Feedback: Provide regular feedback to students about their progress. This can help them understand where they are doing well and where they need to improve. It also gives you an opportunity to adjust the course content or teaching methods if necessary (Adarkwah, 2021; Joseph, 2023; Office of Faculty Development & Educational Support, 2023) 
    • Inclusive Language: Use positive and strengths-based inclusive language in your syllabus and course materials. This can help create a welcoming learning environment for all students (Office of Faculty Development & Educational Support, 2023; Leary, 2024) 
    • Accessibility: Ensure that all course materials are accessible to all students. This could involve providing lecture notes in advance, using closed captions for videos, or offering alternative assignments for students with specific needs (Thurber & Bandy, 2018; MacPherson Institute, 2023; CAST, 2024) 
      • For example: explicitly mentioning this within the syllabus can help emphasize your intentionality with universal supports, as well as facilitate an inclusive learning environment for all 

Academic Integrity

Guidance for Use of Generative AI 

Course Evaluations

Explanations of Assessments

UDL-Focused Types of Assessments and Weightages 

From a UDL perspective, it’s important to provide multiple means of action and expression. This means offering different methods for students to demonstrate what they are learning (CAST, 2024). Here are some types of assessments that align with UDL principles: 

  • Alternative Assessments: provide alternative ways for students to demonstrate their understanding, other than the more “traditional” methods such as essays or multiple-choice quizzes. The focus and emphasis is on student learning rather than the assessment method itself (Poproski, 2021). Examples can include multimedia presentations, ePortfolios, or demonstrations 

Remember, the goal is to ensure that all learners can act on new information and demonstrate what they know. For example, if writing long responses to text passages is the only option for assessment, students who are not native English speakers may have more demands and fewer benefits.  

When it comes to assessment weightages, UDL doesn’t provide specific guidelines. However, the principles of UDL encourage flexibility and inclusivity. By considering these points when designing your syllabus, you can create a more inclusive and effective learning environment. 

Here are some considerations: 

  • Distribute Weightages: Instead of having one or two high-stakes exams that make up the majority of the grade, consider distributing the weightage across multiple assessments (CAST, 2020a). This can reduce stress and provide more opportunities for students to demonstrate their understanding 
    • Chunking – breaking down an assignment into individual pieces – for example instead of handing in an essay, first you hand in a proposal, then a first draft, then a revised copy, and then the final version 
    • Scaffolding – providing progressive and incremental supports – for example, what does a student need to know/be able to do/have skills in before starting a new concept, or alternatively, how will you provide these supports during the activity to help ensure the students will find success 
  • Offer Choices: Similar to alternative assessments, allow students some choice in how they are assessed. For example, you might let students choose between writing a paper or giving a presentation for a particular assignment. This can engage students and allow them to play to their strengths (CAST, 2020a, Takacs, Zhang, Lee, Truong, & Smulders, 2022; Collier, 2023; Novak, 2023) 
  • Provide Clear Expectations: Make sure students understand how their work will be graded, and provide evaluative methods such as rubrics or grading criteria in advance (CAST, 2020a; Takacs et al., 2022) 


Final Exam (if applicable)
Course Materials
Important Dates and Deadlines 
Program Policies and Guidelines 
Field Trip Release (SR5) 

next Alternative Syllabus Presentation

The official course syllabus will be presented through Simple Syllabus, though we would also encourage you to represent your syllabus in alternative formats, such as those aligned to UDL. Using the elements from Simple Syllabus, here is guidance to create an alternative syllabus presentation. 

A UDL-aligned syllabus is a strategic educational tool that integrates specific UDL principles to enhance learning. It provides multiple means of representation, ensuring content is accessible through various formats like text, audio, and video, each with supportive features like alternative text and captions. 

The syllabus also embodies multiple means of action and expression, offering students various ways to engage with material and demonstrate understanding. This could include traditional essays, multimedia projects, or oral presentations, allowing for personalized expressions of learning. 

Multiple means of engagement are reflected in the syllabus by connecting academic concepts to real-world scenarios, which can increase relevance and motivation for students. The layout is predictable and user-friendly, with clear headings and consistent formatting, reducing unnecessary complexity and aiding navigation. 

Start small, but intentional. You may consider representing certain more text-heavy content visually instead, such as through concept maps or flow charts. For example, you could represent the course learning outcomes (CLOs) graphically as outlined by EnACT~PTD.

The image shows a flowchart with three main columns, each representing different student learning objectives for an ENGL 0360 course. The first column on the left is titled “Apply contemporary theories of writing and literature pedagogy to design and evaluate classroom materials” and includes items like “Innovative Report,” “Lesson Plan Critique,” “Mid-Term/Final Exam,” and “Writer’s Notebook.” The middle column is titled “Evaluate K-12 students’ writing using a variety of response and assessment methods” with items like “Mid-Term/Final Exam” and “Responding to Student Writing Workshop.” The third column on the right is titled “Write in multiple academic and personal genres to improve their writing” and includes items like “Innovative Report,” “Lesson Plan Critique,” “Writing Activity,” “Mid-Term/Final Exam,” and “Writer’s/Teacher Workshop.” Each column is connected with arrows indicating that these objectives are part of a cohesive program or course structure.
3 main CLOs with their demonstrations of learning below 
The image shows a flowchart with the title “Student Learning Objectives ENGL 3360.” It is divided into three main columns, each representing different objectives for students. The first column is titled “Apply contemporary theories of composition and rhetoric pedagogy to design effective writing classroom activities” and includes subcategories such as “Instructor Textbook,” “Writer’s Notebook,” and “Design mini-lessons for Writing and Peer Review.” The second column is titled “Evaluate a variety of response and assessment methods including the rhetorical principles behind those methods” with subcategories like “Instructor Textbook,” “Writer’s Notebook,” and activities such as responding to student writing. The third column is titled “Write in multiple academic and professional genres to develop their own writing process and critical approaches to improving that process,” including similar subcategories and additional activities related to developing a model for critical response. Each column has various boxes connected by arrows, indicating a sequence or relationship between the concepts listed.
3 main CLOs with their demonstrations of learning below as well as modes of student expression 

By continuously evolving with student input, the syllabus remains relevant and responsive, embodying the UDL commitment to a flexible and inclusive educational environment. It’s a practical application of UDL, demonstrating an educator’s dedication to supporting every student’s academic journey. The next section will provide specific examples of alternative syllabus presentation. 

Following multiple means of representation, engagement, and action & expression, there are a number of alternative ways to present the syllabus, such as: 

Graphic Syllabus: A graphic syllabus can tell a compelling story about the course and the instructor’s enthusiasm. For instance, Jen Moon from the University of Texas created a graphic syllabus for her Advanced Intro to Genetics course, focusing on readability and student engagement. This approach aligns with UDL by providing multiple means of representation, allowing students to visualize the course structure and expectations, which caters to different learning styles and aids in comprehension. 

Interactivity:
Integrate interactive elements such as clickable areas that expand to reveal more information or embedded quizzes to self-test understanding of the syllabus content 

Discipline-Specific Icons:
Use discipline-specific icons or images to represent different sections or topics within the syllabus, making it visually intuitive for students from that field 

Discipline Specific Examples:

  • Architecture: Use architectural blueprints as a metaphor, with course modules laid out like a building plan, showing the foundation, pillars, and structure of the course content. 
  • Music: Design the syllabus as a musical score, where each section corresponds to a part of the composition, indicating the rhythm and pace of the course. 
  • Literature: Incorporate character maps and plot timelines that visually outline the study of various literary works. 

Infographic Syllabus: Dr. Elaine Young at Champlain College transformed her Marketing 490 course syllabus into an infographic, making it visually appealing and easy to navigate. By transforming a syllabus into an infographic, it adheres to the UDL principle of engagement, drawing students’ interest and providing information in a format that is easy to scan and understand. 

Data Visualization: For subjects like statistics or data science, include graphs or charts that outline the course trajectory or assessment weights. 

QR Codes: Add QR Codes linking to additional resources, such as introductory videos or relevant reading materials

Discipline Specific Examples: 

  • History: Present a timeline with embedded historical footage and narratives that students can explore to understand the course’s scope 
  • Computer Science: Use a branching narrative to illustrate decision trees or algorithm flows, making abstract concepts tangible 
  • Film Studies: Present the syllabus as a storyboard, with each module represented by a scene, complete with visual elements that set the stage for learning objectives 
  • Psychology: Use a case study format, where each section of the syllabus is presented through the lens of a different psychological theory or phenomenon

Digital Storytelling: Dr. Tona Hangen integrated digital storytelling into her US History course syllabus, reflecting the course content in an engaging manner and detailing course elements and procedures. Incorporating storytelling into a syllabus reflects the UDL principle of expression, encouraging students to connect with the course content in a narrative and memorable way. 

Narrative Arc: Develop a narrative arc for the syllabus that mirrors the course’s progression, with milestones and key turning points highlighted. 

Student Testimonials: Feature short digital stories or testimonials from past students discussing their learning journey in the course. 

Discipline Specific Examples:  

  • History: Present a timeline with embedded historical footage and narratives that students can explore to understand the course’s scope 
  • Computer Science: Use a branching narrative to illustrate decision trees or algorithm flows, making abstract concepts tangible 
  • Film Studies: Present the syllabus as a storyboard, with each module represented by a scene, complete with visual elements that set the stage for learning objectives 
  • Psychology: Use a case study format, where each section of the syllabus is presented through the lens of a different psychological theory or phenomenon 
Download

Action Figures: Dr. Susan Sheridan used skeleton action figures in her syllabus for Fundamentals of Biological Anthropology to highlight topics, creating a thorough and visually engaging document. Using action figures or other visual aids in a syllabus supports the UDL principle of representation, making abstract concepts more concrete and relatable for students. 

Augmented Reality (AR): Integrate AR elements that can be accessed via smartphones to bring the action figures to life providing a dynamic way to explore course topics

Customizable Figures: Allow students to customize these figures or avatars to represent their learning goals or interests within the course

Discipline Specific Examples: 

  • Sports Science: Employ action figures in athletic poses to represent different units of study, such as anatomy, physiology, and kinesiology 
  • Theater: Use miniature stage sets and characters to depict the syllabus, illustrating the ‘drama’ of the course’s progression 

Visual Literacy: Courses focusing on visual literacy, such as those analyzed in a content analysis study, often employ visual displays to enhance learning across disciplines. Courses that integrate visual literacy practices support UDL by enhancing students’ ability to interpret and create visual information, which is crucial for engagement and expression in a digital world. In design and pedagogy, visual literacy theory informs design, helping learners become analytical consumers of visual data (Blake, 2016). Faculty engage students in reflective construction of meaningful projects across a variety of curricula to enhance critical thinking. Applying visual literacy theory in design and pedagogy aligns with UDL’s expression and representation principles, helping students become critical consumers of visual media and effective communicators. 

Interactive Infographics: Create infographics that students can manipulate, such as dragging and dropping elements to form study plans or timelines. 

Visual Annotations: Encourage students to annotate visuals with their insights or questions, fostering a more active engagement with the syllabus content.  

Design Challenges: Include design challenges or prompts within the syllabus that encourage students to apply visual literacy in problem-solving. 

Portfolio Development: Guide students in developing a visual portfolio that documents their learning process and outcomes throughout the course. 

Discipline Specific Examples: 

  • Geography: Integrate maps and geographic information system (GIS) elements to navigate through the syllabus, highlighting the exploration of physical and human landscapes 
  • Graphic Design: Create a visual identity for the course, including logos and branding elements 
  • Engineering: Integrate CAD drawings and 3D printing prototypes into the syllabus to preview design projects. Utilize schematics and engineering drawings to represent course modules, emphasizing the precision and planning involved in the field 
  • Fashion Design: Craft the syllabus as a fashion collection book, where each section showcases a different aspect of the course as a garment or accessory, complete with design sketches  
  • Culinary Arts: Present the syllabus as a menu, with each course section described as a course in a meal, detailing the “ingredients” (topics) and “preparation” (assignments) 

These examples demonstrate how syllabi can be more than just documents; they can be creative, interactive, and reflective of the course content. By employing visual elements and considering the principles of UDL, instructors can create syllabi that are not only informative but also engaging and accessible to all students, catering to a wide range of learning styles and preferences. This approach aligns with UDL by providing multiple means of representation and engagement, thereby supporting a more inclusive and effective learning environment. 

Next check for success

The UDL Syllabus Rubric, developed by EnACT~PD, is a valuable tool that helps you design a syllabus that is inclusive and responsive to the diverse needs of your students. By incorporating the rubric’s principles, you can create a syllabus that personalizes the learning experience, responds proactively to student queries, empowers students with resources, and ensures accessibility for all. 

As you finalize your syllabus, it’s essential to ensure that it aligns with the principles of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) and supports a student-centered approach. This section provides an overview of how you can use the UDL Syllabus Rubric and a UDL checklist to achieve these goals.

In addition to the rubric, using a UDL checklist allows you to systematically review your syllabus, identifying areas for improvement and ensuring that it meets the UDL principles. This process helps you create a dynamic, living document that evolves alongside your students, fostering an inclusive and engaging learning environment.  

By integrating these tools into your syllabus design process, you can ensure that your syllabus not only meets the necessary academic standards but also supports all learners effectively, paving the way for a successful and inclusive educational experience. 

UDL Syllabus Rubric 

The UDL Syllabus Rubric is more than a set of guidelines; it is the embodiment of the UDL framework, meticulously tailored for syllabus design. As a blueprint for educators, it facilitates the creation of universally accessible learning environments that are finely tuned to the individual needs and aspirations of each student. This rubric is a practical instrument that effectively bridges the gap between the lofty ideals of Universal Design for Learning and the concrete aspects of course design.  

A table comparing different elements of three types of syllabi: Traditional Syllabus, Enhanced Syllabus, and Exemplary Syllabus. The elements compared include Instructor Information, Course Assignments (percentage/points), Course Assignments (grading criteria), Course Calendar, Learning Outcomes/Objectives, Textbook(s) (required), Textbook(s) (optional/supplemental), Technology Requirements, Additional Resources/Supplies, Policies on Academic Integrity/Misconduct, Policies on Classroom Behavior, Policies on Late Work/Missed Exams/Make-up Policy, Accessibility Statement/Disability Services Information, Diversity Statement (if applicable), and Format (visible elements). Each type of syllabus is described in terms of these elements with additional Tips/Tools provided in the last column.
Figure 6, EnACT~PTD (2023),  https://enact.sonoma.edu/ld.php?content_id=39359387 

The UDL Syllabus Rubric not only adheres to the principles of UDL but also champions student-centered learning. This approach places the student at the heart of the educational experience, recognizing that each learner is unique and that learning is most effective when it is personalized and responsive to individual needs. In particular, the UDL Syllabus Rubric emphasizes the following areas: 

  • Personalization: By advocating for varied ways to contact the instructor and multiple submission formats, the rubric personalizes the learning experience, allowing students to feel seen and supported in their educational journey 
  • Responsiveness: The detailed guidance and examples provided for assignments and grading criteria ensure that the syllabus responds to student queries and concerns proactively, reducing uncertainties and building confidence 
  • Empowerment: Informing students about available resources empowers them to take charge of their learning, seek assistance when needed, and utilize the tools at their disposal to succeed. 
  • Accessibility: Making the syllabus available in accessible formats and through multiple channels ensures that all students, regardless of ability or background, can engage with the course content fully and equitably 

By embedding the rubric’s principles into the syllabus, instructors empower themselves to construct a learning experience that is not only rich and accessible but also deeply reflective of the diverse learning community they serve. In adopting this rubric, a syllabus transforms into a dynamic, living document—a guide that evolves alongside its students, laying the foundation for an academic journey that is as inclusive as it is engaging. Ultimately, it paves the way for a student-centered educational experience in any classroom

UDLing into Practice

Ready for next

Course Design